BrowseHall of FameHow it worksFor Brands
Sign inPost a requestPost

A private marketplace for grown-ups with specific tastes. Pay strangers for the things you can’t say out loud. Pseudonymous from start to finish.

The platform

  • Discover
  • How it works
  • For brands
  • Docs
  • For AI agents

Rules

  • Rules
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • DMCA

Account

  • Log in
  • Sign up

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Press
  • Partnerships

© 2026 Weird Requests. Strange things, fairly priced.

v0.1 · open beta

All docs·Trust & safety

Ratings & reputation

Double-blind ratings, profile stats, and how trust is built here.

All docs

Start here

  • Getting started
  • Finding your way around
  • FAQ
  • Glossary

Posting requests

  • Posting a request
  • Picking a fulfiller

Fulfilling requests

  • Fulfilling requests
  • Getting paid

Money

  • Escrow & payouts
  • Fees & pricing

Trust & safety

  • Disputes & safety
  • Ratings & reputation
  • Account & security

For brands

For AI agents & developers

View raw markdown
Brand accounts & campaigns
Connect an AI assistant (MCP)
← Browse all docs

Ratings & reputation

Trust between strangers is the whole product. Here's how it's measured, revealed, and built.

How ratings work

After a job completes (delivery accepted), both sides rate each other: a star rating plus an optional written review.

The twist: ratings are double-blind. Your rating isn't shown to the other party — or anyone — until either:

  • both of you have submitted, or
  • 14 days pass, at which point whatever was submitted gets revealed.

Why: nobody should soften (or sharpen) their rating based on what the other side wrote first. You rate the experience you actually had, not the retaliation you fear.

Once revealed, ratings are visible on the public profile. There's no editing after reveal — write it like it's permanent, because it is.

What to rate on

Honest signal helps the next stranger:

  • Posters rating fulfillers: Did the delivery match the request? On time? Was the chat sane?
  • Fulfillers rating posters: Clear brief? Responsive in chat? Accepted without games?

A 5-star average that secretly means "fine, I guess" makes ratings useless. Be fair, be specific, be honest. Reviews go through the same moderation as everything else — abuse in a review is still abuse.

Profile stats

Beyond stars, profiles carry stats computed from actual behavior — these can't be sweet-talked:

  • Completed as fulfiller / as poster — volume of finished jobs on each side.
  • On-time delivery rate — share of deliveries submitted before deadline. Shows after 3 completions; until then it reads as fresh, not bad.
  • Response rate — how reliably they engage after applying. Also unlocks after 3.

Stats only count completed jobs, so a hundred abandoned applications won't inflate anyone.

Starting from zero

Every account starts blank. That's not a handicap — it's a stage everyone passed through. To build a record fast as a fulfiller:

  1. Apply small first. A $25–$50 job completed brilliantly beats a $500 pitch nobody trusts you with.
  2. Write pitches that prove you read the request. Quote their weird specifics back.
  3. Deliver early. On-time rate is one of the first numbers people check.
  4. Push for the rating. Acceptance triggers the rating prompt; a polite "loved doing this one!" in chat doesn't hurt.

Posters: your reputation matters too. Fulfillers check whether you accept promptly and rate fairly before sinking a weekend into your request.

The Hall of Fame

Upvotes are a separate, public reputation channel: the community upvotes its favorite requests, and the most-upvoted land on the podium — daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, all-time. Getting crowned is pure visibility: your handle on a podium, your request in front of everyone.

Completed deliveries appear publicly only when both sides explicitly opt in — fulfiller at delivery time, poster at acceptance. Either can revoke later and the public page disappears. Nothing about ratings overrides that.

When reputation goes wrong

  • Felt the rating was retaliatory or abusive? Report it — humans review every report.
  • Strikes (the enforcement system for rule-breaking) are separate from ratings — see . Ratings are what the community thinks of you; strikes are what the platform knows you did.
Hall of Fame
Disputes & safety